Under poor laws enacted in the late 1500s and later revisions in England, parishes were responsible for the care of the poor among them. From the late 1500s until 1834, Overseers of the Poor were appointed by Justices of the Peace.
These Overseers were responsible for all aspects of the poor law. They looked after sick relief, took care of the aged, provided children of the poor with apprenticeships, found work for the able-bodied among the poor, and assisted the local constable in his duties. They also maintained a “house of correction” for vagrants, as well as the poor house.
Included in this category are records relating to overseer’s accounts, settlement and removal orders, the care of illegitimate children, poorhouses, vagrants, apprenticeships (some of which were voluntary, and some of which were not), and any other matters relating to the poor.
Taxes were imposed to assist the poor, including poorhouses and vagrant "correctional houses", as well as for providing public services. In a similar manner to today, taxes, or “rates”, were charged for public services like watchmen, sewers, lighting, pest control, and so on. Accounting records were kept of amounts assessed, received, and disbursed. These records generally are very extensive, where they survived.
Children born out of wedlock were the responsibility of the parish, unless the officials could find out who the father was. If the father was discovered, he would have to sign a “bond of indemnification” (commonly known as a “bastardy bond”) stating that he would take financial responsibility for the child.
Parish councils therefore took this situation very seriously. The woman would be examined before a magistrate (think of the term “cross-examination” in the legal world today!) to try to determine who the father was. Alternatively, the midwife would examine her while she was in labour.
One set of records which had been transcribed and which I viewed online showed that this method was very effective in producing a name for the child’s father, at least in that parish; there was a list of some 40 women over a specified time period, all of whom named someone as the father of their child, and in most cases, gave an address, or a description of where the man lived or worked. Whether or not those men actually were the fathers, of course, is another matter.
Bastardy bonds and/or records of a woman’s examination are among the records that would be found in the parish chest records.
After 1834, with the changes to the laws and the introduction of Poor Law Unions, these bonds would be found in the Quarter Session records, if the illegitimate child's mother made application for such a bond.
The parish or the father would be responsible for the child's welfare at the longest to age 14, at which time the child would be able to work and support himself or herself.
Other records in this category include:
While in the normal course of events, it was the child’s father who placed him or her in an apprenticeship, the Parish Council or the Overseers of the Poor also were known to handle this for pauper children. It was a matter of finances: it was less expensive to place a child in an apprenticeship than to bring him up.
There may be a reference to the child in the minutes to a vestry meeting, when the child was discussed and it was decided to place him in an apprenticeship. There may also be an apprenticeship agreement, or record, among the parish chest documents.
As noted above, parishes were responsible for taking care of the poor and the aged within their boundaries. They also assessed rates, or taxes, to take care of many other public functions.
This meant that, when a new family arrived in the parish and shortly afterwards asked for assistance under the Poor Laws, parish officials often sought to have the individuals removed to the parish they had come from, on grounds that the new parish was not responsible for them.
It also meant that individuals who had been living within a particular parish for many years, who suddenly fell upon hard times, could be subject to questioning by the local officials as to how long they had lived there, and what sort of ties they had that could prove that, when they moved there, their intention was to take up permanent residence there.
A set of rules was developed to determine the issue of settlement and where a person legally had a right to reside in these circumstances.
Individuals were known to use apprenticeship records from a number of years before, or other documents showing intention to reside in a location and be a contributing member of that society, in an attempt to prove that they belonged in that parish.
Removal orders meant that the local constable was issued an order to escort the family being sent away from the parish to what had been determined to be their legal place of settlement under the Poor Laws.
Settlement orders, of course, allowed the person to stay in the parish.
This way of proceeding, naturally, discouraged those who were poor from moving to another parish in search of work, as if they had reason to call upon the local parish for assistance at any time after moving there, they would either have to prove that they were entitled to settle there, or be removed back to their home parish.
Click here for upcoming webinars, courtesy of Geneawebinars.
Heard the buzz about the new Flip-Pal scanner? See my review, here, or click on the ad, below, to go directly to their website.
Looking into DNA testing for genealogy purposes?
Try 23andMe, or FTDNA (click the links below).